Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MB-UPF] PFCP: PFCP Session Establishment Response #5

Open
Borjis131 opened this issue Nov 20, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

[MB-UPF] PFCP: PFCP Session Establishment Response #5

Borjis131 opened this issue Nov 20, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Borjis131
Copy link

Following 3GPP TS 29.244 - Release 17.9.0

Add PFCP IEs:

  • 8.2.207 - Multicast Transport Information

To be used in PFCP Session Establishment Response:

  • MBS Session N4mb Information (grouped IE with Multicast Transport Information)
@Borjis131 Borjis131 self-assigned this Nov 20, 2023
@Borjis131
Copy link
Author

Raised an issue into Wireshark's GitLab to correct a bug parsing the C-TEID field in the PFCP Session Establishment Response

@Borjis131
Copy link
Author

Issue with 3GPP TS 29.244 having an incorrect information element name on the table 7.5.3.1-4 for MBS Session N4mb Information IE being discussed here: 5G-MAG/Standards#99

Open5GS fixed this here: open5gs#2887

@Borjis131
Copy link
Author

In order to forward the packets MB-UPF makes use of smcroute:

# Inside  MB-UPF container
apt install smcroute
smcroute -d
smcroutectl add eth0 239.0.0.20 ogstun
# Check the route is correctly added
smcroutectl

You could add an static route with iproute2 achieving the same funcitonality, but using the smcroute way could make this approach to be auto configurable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant