Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Feature Request] withdraw the current piece #979

Closed
ImpleLee opened this issue Sep 15, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

[Feature Request] withdraw the current piece #979

ImpleLee opened this issue Sep 15, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
dispute Controversial issue enhancement New feature or request fixed or duplicate Already fixed or exists

Comments

@ImpleLee
Copy link
Contributor

Currently this is possible in tetr.io.

A semantic decision: should related random generators also make a step back?

  • 👍 prevents leaking future information to the user.
  • 👎 may be abused to select the best randomness.

(Related: #978, which can be similarly abused.)
@ImpleLee ImpleLee added enhancement New feature or request dispute Controversial issue hard Hard to fix REMAKE Just wait for the remake labels Sep 15, 2023
@ImpleLee ImpleLee mentioned this issue Sep 16, 2023
Open
@ImpleLee
Copy link
Contributor Author

Duplicate of #750 .

@Not-A-Normal-Robot Not-A-Normal-Robot added fixed or duplicate Already fixed or exists and removed hard Hard to fix REMAKE Just wait for the remake labels Sep 23, 2023
@Not-A-Normal-Robot Not-A-Normal-Robot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Sep 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
dispute Controversial issue enhancement New feature or request fixed or duplicate Already fixed or exists
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Not-A-Normal-Robot @ImpleLee